Why Tamil Nadu protesters should stop politicising IPL over the Cauvery water dispute
Chennai Super Kings (CSK) made a perfect comeback to the IPL by winning their second match against Kolkata Knight Riders, after chasing down a steep target of 202. Sam Billings had played a blinder and Dwayne Bravo was putting on the finishing touches as he ensured CSK got the 17 runs required off the last over.
The crowd inside the Chepauk Stadium was going berserk with joy. After two disappointing years, this was their moment of happiness and redemption. But amidst this air of celebration, a very different subtext was also unfolding at the same time. In the eighth over of the match, a shoe was hurled by the spectators at CSK player Ravindra Jadeja. The shoe landed near the boundary line, very close to the South African captain Faf Du Plessis and his national teammate Lungi Ngidi who were taking a stroll. The police intervened -- two people were immediately arrested in connection with the incident and three others from the group were also detained for raising 'We want Cauvery' slogans. A couple of shoes were also thrown which landed within the stands and it is difficult to ascertain if any player was specifically targeted. In fact, CSK's homecoming after two seasons has been marred by violent protests with many people across the state demanding IPL matches be cancelled as the state is still reeling under a severe water crisis.'No IPL until the Cauvery dispute gets resolved'
For the last few days, Tamil Nadu has been rocked by anti-IPL protests with many people claiming that holding the tournament without addressing the more pressing concern of the state's water crisis is a case of misplaced priorities. The Cauvery dispute which dates back to 1892 has been a bone of contention between the neighbouring states of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka for decades now. As per the agreements made in 1892 and 1924, the distribution of water from the Cauvery basin was supposed to be -- 75% to Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, 23% to Karnataka, and the rest to Kerala. While any disputes back then were resolved by the British, the disagreement led to conflicts after post-independence re-organisations. While both Karnataka and Tamil Nadu are heavily dependent on Cauvery water, the former has often exploited its upper riparian position and refused to release water. Unlike rivers like the Ganga which have mountainous origins, the Cauvery is completely rain-fed which is why both the states are left with a severe water crisis whenever there is a poor monsoon. Karnataka has often argued that it has every right not to release water to Tamil Nadu if it cannot provide for its own needs. After a Supreme Court ruling in September 2016 asking Karnataka to release 15,000 cusecs of water daily to help Tamil Nadu's drought-hit farmers, riots erupted in Bengaluru in protest. A subsequent SC verdict on February 16 this year announced the amount of water that Karnataka must release to Tamil Nadu and ordered the Centre to constitute a Cauvery Water Management Board to implement the verdict.Any cricket lover can be excused for asking what after all is the relation between the Cauvery dispute and the IPL. Why was the demand to cancel matches for the water dispute raised in the first place? And isn't it an unhealthy attempt to politicise a sporting event? The protesters, which include many politicians, fringe groups, and the common public, have cited several reasons for adopting this strange position. Many have argued that holding the IPL will shift the focus away from the much-needed debate and discourse on the water dispute in the state while others have said it would be disgraceful to celebrate a fun-filled sporting event when farmers are suffering because of the water crisis. The matter has, of course, become deeply politicised with politicians playing along, trying best not to hurt public sentiment, and stroking the fire instead to gain mileage out of it. Actor-turned-politician Rajinikanth said it is embarrassing to have Chennai host IPL matches at this time, adding, 'If they don't cancel, they should at least allow players and spectators to wear black badges.' Many protesters have claimed that holding the IPL at a time when farmers are dying and the state is not getting its due from the Centre is absurd and unjust. Interestingly, at a time when the BJP government has incurred the wrath of the protesters, the saffron party in Karnataka tweeted its support for Royal Challengers Bangalore. Political parties in Karnataka, unsurprisingly, have been vocal in their support for the IPL, with the political optics of adopting a position in contradiction to that of Tamil Nadu and expressing a tacit approval of the delay over the constitution of the Cauvery Management Board being so blatant that it cannot be missed. Cauvery dispute and IPL ' a problematic binary?
Stay connected with The Bridge on #socials.